Core deposits are a bank's stable, lower-cost deposits. No statute defines them. Examiners use the Uniform Bank Performance Report definition: transaction accounts, money market and other savings deposits, and time deposits of $250,000 or less, minus fully insured brokered deposits of $250,000 or less. Many banks also keep their own internal definition, which is where reports start to differ.
The same bank can report three core deposit figures: one for regulators, one for investors and one for ALCO.
Product codes come from the core, brokered and reciprocal flags often sit in a separate deposit network or spreadsheet, and segment rules live in the CRM. After a merger, two cores classify the same products differently. Agree the classification rules once, map each system's product codes to them, and run the regulatory and internal figures from the same mapping.
Preql maps how each system classifies deposit products and balances. Finance approves the definition of each core deposit figure, with an owner, version history and lineage back to source, so the regulatory and internal versions are both documented.
Is there an official definition of core deposits?
Not in statute or regulation. Examiners use the UBPR definition.
Can we use our own definition?
Yes, for internal and investor reporting. Label it and don't mix it with the regulatory figure.
Want one approved definition of core deposits across your reports? Book a call with our team.
What happens next: in a 30-minute call, you'll see where your numbers stop matching and why.

